There’s a side of real estate you don’t see on reality TV.

It’s not dramatic negotiations over a marble kitchen island. It’s not agents touring impossibly expensive houses while dressed for a cocktail party.

Most of the time, it’s much less glamorous.

Sometimes it’s simply recognizing a problem, knowing there may be a solution, and making sure your client knows about it — even when that solution doesn’t make you any money.

I was reminded of that this past weekend, when I had a showing at one of my listings. As the listing agent, I attend every buyer showing personally. A lot of my colleagues think I’m nuts for doing that. We’ll save that debate for another article.

I was glad I was there. From the moment the buyers walked through the house, I could tell something was clicking.

They noticed the quality of the kitchen cabinetry. They loved the appliance package. They appreciated that the expensive, decidedly unsexy things homeowners eventually have to deal with — roof, electrical, plumbing — had already been addressed. And then there’s a whole-house generator.

There were plenty of oohs and aahs. This felt like it could be the house for them.

Then came the complication.

After the showing, I learned the buyers wanted to move forward, but they had a home they needed to sell first.

In real estate, that typically means writing what we call a contingent offer: their purchase of the new home is contingent upon successfully selling their existing one.

Those offers aren’t inherently bad. Sometimes they’re exactly the right tool. But they create additional risk for a seller.

Now my seller wouldn’t be just depending on this transaction successfully reaching closing. They’d be indirectly depending on another property, another buyer, another inspection, another appraisal, another lender and another closing — none of which they control.

So when I hear “We have to sell our house first,” my next thought isn’t necessarily:

Well, that’s that.

It’s:

What options do we have?

And in this situation, I knew there might be another one.

There’s more than one way to finance a move.

I’m familiar with a bridge-loan program offered through a local bank that can, for qualified borrowers and the right circumstances, allow homeowners to purchase their next home before completing the sale of their current one.

Could these particular buyers qualify? I don’t know.

Would the numbers make sense for them? That would require an actual conversation with the loan officer I recommended.

But if it worked, it could potentially eliminate the sale contingency, reduce some of the pressure surrounding the move and make their offer considerably more attractive to a seller.

So I shared the option with the representative who contacted me after the showing. The response surprised me.

I was told, essentially, that the buyers were already being taken care of through the brokerage’s affiliated mortgage operation and its specialized client team.

And that was apparently the end of the discussion.

Maybe the bridge loan wouldn’t have worked.

Maybe their existing financing really was the best option.

But shouldn’t the buyer get to make that decision?

That’s the part that bothers me.

I occupy both sides of this world.

I’m a REALTOR®, and I’m also a licensed mortgage loan originator.

If one of my real estate clients also chooses to work with me on their mortgage, do I earn additional income? Of course I do.

I’m running a business. I’m not embarrassed by that. But there is a line I won’t cross.

If I know of another financing option that may put my client in a better position, I’m going to tell them about it — even when recommending it means I don’t earn the mortgage commission.

Because my client didn’t hire me to maximize MY revenue from their transaction. They hired me to help them make the best real estate decision they can.

Those are two very different things.

And this is where representation matters.

The real estate industry has increasingly moved toward ecosystems designed to capture every piece of a transaction:

• Brokerage.
• Mortgage.
• Title.
• Insurance.

Sometimes there are genuine advantages to having services under one roof. Convenience has value, and affiliated services aren’t inherently bad. But consolidation creates a question consumers should be willing to ask:

Is my agent free to recommend the best option for me — even when that option sends my business somewhere else?

Because sometimes the best lender isn’t the affiliated lender. Sometimes the best title company isn’t the preferred title company. Sometimes the best inspector isn’t on somebody’s list. And sometimes solving a problem requires an agent to look outside the ecosystem they’re working in.

You should never have to wonder whose interests come first.

I don’t know whether the financing option I suggested would ultimately work for these buyers. That’s not really the point.

The point is that I believe they deserve to know the option exists, understand its costs and benefits, and decide for themselves whether it’s worth exploring.

Maybe they stay with their current lender. Maybe they don’t.

But their interests should determine that decision — not anyone’s commission or the agent’s brokerage’s parent company’s bottom line (yes, that’s a mouthful, but it’s exactly the scenario I’m describing).

There are a thousand little moments like this in a real estate transaction that never make it onto television or Instagram. Moments when your agent has to decide whether to make the easy recommendation or investigate another option:

• Whether to protect a relationship with a vendor or challenge them.
• Whether to preserve a commission or potentially give it up.
• Whether to tell you what you want to hear or what you need to know.

You probably won’t see most of those decisions happening. But they can have an enormous impact on your transaction.

Who you choose to represent you matters.

Your agent should be willing to put your interests ahead of their own — including their commission.

It’s what I do. Every single time. If that’s what you’re looking for in an agent, let’s schedule a quick call to discuss your goals.

---

This article reflects my personal experience and perspective as a real estate professional. Financing programs, eligibility requirements, costs and individual circumstances vary. Buyers should evaluate available financing options with appropriately licensed professionals before making financial decisions.

NMLS 2673717 | 198414